Well, tomorrows the American holiday of Thanksgiving, and sticking with our tradition, i wanted to say thank you to everyone hat has helped support the show and continues to listen and spread the word. Because of the holiday, i am also releasing the show early, this is the show for the week.
In this show Wes is back to help me with Part 2 of the Q&A, in the show we get to fluorescence and Metal Halides, and hopefully wrap up most of peoples lighting questions.
Or click here to download the individual episode
And Please consider taking the listener survey
__________________
Show people you appreciate there advice, click the icon under there name and give them Reputation points
Hi - I tried to find an answer for this before I asked the question, but is there a way to listen to these podcasts without an i-pod or MP3 player? I'm afraid I'm a bit behind the times technologoically.
Thanks,
Pam
__________________ Always paddling against the current
once subscribed, itunes will give you the ability to download any/all past shows, and will automatically download every new show as soon as i release it..
of course itunes isn't the only client out there, but its the most widely used.
__________________
Show people you appreciate there advice, click the icon under there name and give them Reputation points
this series was great man. I learned loads from listening to all these; are you considering a similar series on other difficult topics (maybe sandbeds, substrate, some husbandry and hitchhiker issues...)?
Oh, unrelated to lighting, i would love to see a vidcast on your copepod cultures
okay okay i will leave you alone now. Again, great shows.
__________________ Samuel
"If they but knew it, almost all men in their degree, some time or other, cherish very nearly the same feelings towards the ocean with me.... There is magic in it. Let the most absent-minded men be plunged in his deepest reveries--stand that man on his legs, set his feet a-going, and he will infallibly lead you to water, if water there be in all that region."
Great series on lighting. You addressed a really difficult topic with a great approach Nice to break things up into a long series.
I just thought I would add one (long, but hopefully educational) comment. I have a candycane coral I've had for a while:
It was sitting mid way up my rock and I got it after my old XM 10K bulbs had already been running for several months and before I had my PAR meter. So the bulbs were weakened before the coral went in the tank. It was happy for several months.
Well, every since I put in my new XM bulbs (same brand, same 10K), the coral has slowly declined. Last week I noticed some coral skeleton showing through in a couple of places and the part of the coral angled towards the light was doing noticeably worse than the part angled away. So I immediately moved it down to the sandbed. Within just a few days it has puffed up much more, the tentacles are out more during the day and it just looks a lot healthier.
So I looked over my data from the October issue for that spot:
From MH bulbs:
Old XM bulb reading (average): 122.5 PAR
New XM bulb reading (average): 182 PAR
% Increase: 48.6%
Yes a big increase, but not a particularly large PAR number. So I took my PAR meter out tonight and did a quick reading in the spot where the old readings were taken:
All the data points in my article were taken with a level light sensor. I decided to angle the light sensor at about 30 degrees each direction from level (just like my candy cane) and the numbers were very telling:
Angled towards MH bulb: 240 PAR
Angled away from MH bulb: 98 PAR
Add in the 125-175 PAR from my VHO bulbs and the coral facing the MH bulb was receiving over 400 PAR, while the side facing away was getting less than 200 PAR.
I then took my PAR meter and took a reading just above the coral now on the sandbed:
Angled towards MH bulb: 135 PAR
Angled away from MH bulb: 78 PAR
So a lot less PAR and the coral is much happier. You mentioned in your show that a lot of people are happy with their XM bulbs, but I think the 10K bulbs are just too much par for my 21" deep tank (I can't keep any coral except zoas high up in my tank).
I'm going to have to look at Dr Joshi's tests and talk to other reefers and go to a 12-15K bulb so I can keep corals higher in the tank.
lol... great info...
here is some other info...
i noticed my candy cane doing the same thing... certain parts were starting to thin out, and the skeleton was visible through the tissue.. but instead of moving it, i started to spot feed it, low and behold, it started to look better and fill out more..
basically the exact same thing as you describes, except instead of moving the coral, i fed it meaty foods more often, and got the same results...
but i think you do bring up good points on coral placement and the idea that there is a such thing as "too much" light
__________________
Show people you appreciate there advice, click the icon under there name and give them Reputation points
lol... great info...
here is some other info...
i noticed my candy cane doing the same thing... certain parts were starting to thin out, and the skeleton was visible through the tissue.. but instead of moving it, i started to spot feed it, low and behold, it started to look better and fill out more..
basically the exact same thing as you describes, except instead of moving the coral, i fed it meaty foods more often, and got the same results...
but i think you do bring up good points on coral placement and the idea that there is a such thing as "too much" light
Well, I didn't want to make my post any longer than it was, but since you commented....
Every coral that will take meaty food gets target fed twice a week. So it definitely wasn't a lack of food in this case. Although I did notice the polyps facing the MH light had stopped taking food. I saw feeding tentacles out for the first time in a while from the damaged ones this morning. I'll try to feed it tomorrow morning.
icon under there name and give them Reputation points
