dreams
05-31-2006, 11:02 PM
i was at a site today & they have a stocking guide, which is actually pretty cool....but anyways, when i put in pj cardinals, this is what it said....huh?
There are some significant problems with your stocking list. pajama cardinalfish will be a problem, it may be too large for the tank, and/or may potentially kill some of the other fish you've added.
fat walrus
05-31-2006, 11:11 PM
trust no stocking guide. a lot of information is just not correct. PJ's are fine. i've had dozens in my life. the BIGGEST one never got to more than the size of a handball.
dreams
05-31-2006, 11:16 PM
see, now that was what i thought
do you think they would be okay w/ sexy shrimp?.....or are they too small & might get eaten by the cardinals?
i really want some of those little cuties
fat walrus
05-31-2006, 11:22 PM
sexy shrimps i wouldn't try. two close to mysis in size.
dreams
05-31-2006, 11:31 PM
oh well....maybe someday, when i am more knowledgable, i can have a nano....then, i can have them.....i would love a nano on my kitchen counter
fat walrus
05-31-2006, 11:35 PM
a nano is easy to do, and far cheaper to buy and maintain.
RazerCorals
06-01-2006, 01:37 AM
PJs are generally well behaved its the threadfins you need to watch out for
Cjvolitan
06-01-2006, 06:18 AM
hum and people thought my yellow tang thread was wierd. Pajama cardinals are sweet hearts i have never kept or heard of one that would hurt a fly they will eat things samll enough to fit in their mouths though but being small them selves i don't see thins as much of a problem.
gwen_o_lyn
06-01-2006, 09:14 PM
a nano is easy to do, and far cheaper to buy and maintain.
I think a nano is much harder. Much easier to screw something up when you are only working with 10 gallons compared to a 100g. And everything happens much faster too: temp swings, balancing chemistry, evaporation.
Nanos aren't for newbies in my opinion.
fat walrus
06-01-2006, 10:30 PM
I think a nano is much harder. Much easier to screw something up when you are only working with 10 gallons compared to a 100g. And everything happens much faster too: temp swings, balancing chemistry, evaporation.
Nanos aren't for newbies in my opinion.
gwen, you are right. a nano is definitly harder for someone who hasn't gotten their hands wet. what i meant was that it would be easy after dream's second tank experience with her 110, and would be cheaper to buy and maintain in comparison to her current project. sorry, my verbal(or is it writing?) skills still need work.
gwen_o_lyn
06-01-2006, 10:51 PM
ok cool! Just didn't want someone thinking something different about nanos! I can be one to tell ya they ain't easy- especially w/ 150W MH on a 12g tank that holds less than 10g of water. :)
we love our pj cardinal. it's very peaceful and only eats the food we feed it: frozen, flake & pellets.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v681/valeen/pjcardinal2small.jpg