The Talkingreef Community
   

Its time to enter the September POTM Contest

Go Back   The Talkingreef Community

» Photo of The Month
» Talkingreef Live (TRL)
» Online Users: 71
1 members and 70 guests
Skurvey Dog
Most users ever online was 570, 05-23-2008 at 06:55 PM.
» Comment line

Powered by MyChingo
» Site Partners


Reefkeeping


Project DIBS


ReefPedia

» Sponsor
» Advertisement

Remove Advertisement

View Single Post
Old 12-21-2007, 11:59 PM   #14 (permalink)
mikellini
Apprentice
 
mikellini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Fort McMurray Alberta Canada
Posts: 141
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
mikellini is on a distinguished road
I see what you mean, but I have to disagree. The filter chamber in the Biocube 8 has to be at least a gallon, probably more like 2... and yes, there would be a substantial increase in the flow through that chamber, but it would still only be flowing 1.6 times faster than before. This would still be more than acceptable for a product like Chemipure or for a skimmer (which I'm starting to think wouldn't be a great option either).

I wish I had a good LFS around here. Unfortunately, the Biocube 8 at our only LFS in Fort McMurray is priced at $280, and I got this one in Edmonton (5 hours from here) for $160. I suppose I could send the pump back to them, and they are a pretty good LFS, so I'd probably get a replacement fairly quickly, but I'm looking at increasing the flow anyway, so it would just be a big waste of everyone's time and money.

As for the increased flow through the grates, I see what you mean here too. Only thing is, I'm not looking to stock with fish, and certainly not an anemone. I was thinking about some non-photosynthetic corals, and the feeding could become an issue. In that case, I'd just turn off the pump. I think even if I kept the stock pump, I'd have to turn it off though, so there you go I guess...

PhotoJohn: I used to think the same way as you: if it ain't broke, don't break it yourself. However, when I learned some of the reasoning behind the manufacturers designs, I started to realize why it might work for the majority of people, but wouldn't work for me. You see, the vast majority of people who want a small, desk-type all-in-one saltwater tank are looking to buy a "Nemo". For the purpose of keeping fish, a wet-dry trickle filter is a great solution. Fish can tolerate much higher levels of dissolved nitrate in the water without showing any ill effects; however many sessile invertebrates cannot. Since I'm not planning on having any fish, and exclusively corals, water quality is of much greater concern, and to this end, I am making modifications to the stock filtration that are designed to achieve pristine water quality. One of the best ways to do this (as far as I know) is to set up a macroalgae refugium that will use up excess nitrates in the water. There are other ways, such as chemical adsorbants, some corals (Xenia for example) and protein skimming (to remove organic compounds before they break down into nitrates), and all of these work with the natural process of denitrification via LR and LS to keep nitrates to a minimum. What it's going to come down to is what will work the best in a small tank such as the BC8.
mikellini is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ad Management by RedTyger