The Talkingreef Community
   

Let the POTM voting begin !! Click this banner to vote now !!

Go Back   The Talkingreef Community

» Photo of The Month
» Talkingreef Live (TRL)
» Online Users: 73
7 members and 66 guests
agsansoo, Albacore05, lReef lKeeper, Monza28, ryandlf, sherman50, vanmo92
Most users ever online was 570, 05-23-2008 at 07:55 PM.
» Comment line

Powered by MyChingo
» Sponsor
» Advertisement

Remove Advertisement

Thread: Which Filter?
View Single Post
Old 11-13-2007, 12:24 AM   #9 (permalink)
Stargazer
Curious Reefer
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Akron, Ohio
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Stargazer is an unknown quantity at this point
The Fluval x05 series are, I think, mechanically better than the Magnum (I have a Magnum 350, a Fluval 205, two 305's, and a 404). The Fluvals prime much easier and the Magnum is prone to impeller wear if you suck up fine grain sand. The disconnect for the Fluval hoses is much better (easier to disconnect, less water spilled).

I don't use the ceramic media in the Fluvals on SW tanks (I use them on both FW and SW). I load my SW Fluvals with floss, carbon, Purigen and phosphate sponge.

The Magnum is a great filter for water polishing, as Carmie said, with the micron paper cartridge. And you can load it up with diatom powder, if you want. I use my Magnum to suck up suspended detritus whan I stir the sand in the SW tanks and to vacuum out the sump. I got the gavel vac attachment for the Magnum and use that for cleaning our FW substrates. It works super for that.

I am glad I have both.
Stargazer is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ad Management by RedTyger