The Talkingreef Community
   

Let the POTM voting begin !! Click this banner to vote now !!

Go Back   The Talkingreef Community

» Photo of The Month
» Talkingreef Live (TRL)
» Online Users: 67
3 members and 64 guests
JeremyHaze17, Phurst, Shadowfox1198
Most users ever online was 570, 05-23-2008 at 07:55 PM.
» Comment line

Powered by MyChingo
» Sponsor
» Advertisement

Remove Advertisement

View Single Post
Old 05-06-2007, 02:41 AM   #12 (permalink)
johnnyblackheart
Curious Reefer
 
johnnyblackheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 28
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
johnnyblackheart is on a distinguished road
gwen_o_lyn,

I have recently purchased the 250watt HQI retro kit from HelloLights. I have not installed it yet, but here are some pictures of the unit. I personally prefer the electronic ballast over the magnetic because of the smaller footprint offered by the electronic ballast. The “cores” of magnetic ballast are big and heavy and do get hot, also they have to be shielded from the water. This to me means you almost have to locate them remote from the light, whereas the electronic ballast I can easily place within the canopy. Hope this helps.

Picture #1
Shot of the electronic ballast

Picture #2, 3, 4
Shots of the reflector

Picture #5
Shot of my Magnetic ballast core, capacitor, and ignitor stuffed inside a enclosure.

Picture #6
Side by side of the Magnetic and electronic ballast
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Pic-1.jpg (110.6 KB, 3 views)
File Type: jpg Pic-2.jpg (56.5 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg Pic-3.jpg (53.3 KB, 0 views)
File Type: jpg Pic-4.jpg (60.7 KB, 0 views)
File Type: jpg Pic-5.jpg (70.7 KB, 0 views)
File Type: jpg Pic-6.jpg (58.9 KB, 0 views)
johnnyblackheart is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ad Management by RedTyger