The Talkingreef Community
   

Let the POTM voting begin !! Click this banner to vote now !!

Go Back   The Talkingreef Community

» Photo of The Month
» Talkingreef Live (TRL)
» Online Users: 57
4 members and 53 guests
CarmieJo, lReef lKeeper, magaman, rroselavy
Most users ever online was 570, 05-23-2008 at 07:55 PM.
» Comment line

Powered by MyChingo
» Sponsor
» Advertisement

Remove Advertisement

View Single Post
Old 12-22-2006, 03:34 AM   #5 (permalink)
NVMark
Curious Reefer
 
NVMark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Incline Village NV
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
NVMark is on a distinguished road
I guess I should clarify a bit. The tank is very mature. Usually things like problems with the 2 Ns are obvious very rapidly by a change in algae growth or coral extension. If I have an Ammonia problem I think it is time to just rip the tank down and go back to gold fish. I do have a PH meter on the tank – in the 8.3 range. And I do an occasional test on Dkh – in the 10.5 range. I find the Ca test kits a bit finicky especial with my color blindness. But when I persevere it is usually a bit over 400. I am eyeing the Pinpoint Ca monitor. I have seen some questionable reviews, but there seemed to be a positive article on it in RC (I think). One item I over looked and probably never tested for is Phosphates and I suppose that a problem with that could have visual clues like the 2 Ns but be a different problem.

I guess what I was more looking for is – Are people dosing anything in addition to the 2 reactors. Such as Iodine, Strontium, Iron, Sulfuric Acid???? Well at lest the first three – with any positive results. It seems that the aquarium trade has come out with all kinds of miracle chemicals that they claim your critters can not live with out. Instead if just writing them off, I thought I would ask. I know that Strontium is part of the benefits of the Ca Reactor, but does it supply enough? I know Rob has mentioned in the TR Podcasts that he adds Iodine it in small amounts. Is Iodine something I can expect that would come from a Ca Reactor? Kind of think not, but I know it is one thing you do not want to add too much of. I know that at one time Iron was a recommend element because of its effect on algae – that would be positive for macro algae. Alk (Dkh) should be held steady by the Kalk… I think. And with two sources of Ca I would think I am good there. Although, I had a coral farmer tell me that almost all Ca Reactors are under rated for a decent tank. If this is true and from what I hear Rob saying in Podcasts the only option might be a 2 part Ca. Back to my visually method of testing my coralline algae growth is pretty impressive. So my finger in the air method says Ca is good.

Any thoughts?

Thanks for all the thought comments,

Mark
NVMark is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ad Management by RedTyger