| commercial opertunities & financial gains.
I do spit on the practice cause its raping the protected zones of the ocean, and the marine authorities handled it well. Although its written they pleaded guilty to such charges it might, i'll repeat, might pay to keep an open mind with extenuating curcumstances. Companies although responsable for their transactions, Reps, Ceo's MD's what-ever, are not always physicly at the point of collection, nor do they follow up closely to how its produced, just as long as it is! Hence the reason is term "suppliers" they consume the stress of meeting quoters, all you do as a company is put a number to the delivery. Im talking outside the box here, i dont know, is the whole area surrounding a protected reserve? are there places close by that are still collection points? You guys see where im getting at. Im not standing up for the practice in the slightest, but before everyone jumps on the band wagon on something that happened 6months ago & condem the company to slander and subsiquent loss of business. Id suggest you be real clear whether it was malicious intent for profit in the first place or just a slap happy supply decsion.
Flame away guys, Im wrapped in heat shelding today..haha
__________________
 V-series Productions | 
