The Talkingreef Community
   

Its time to enter Novembers POTM contest !!

Go Back   The Talkingreef Community

» Photo of The Month
» Talkingreef Live (TRL)
» Online Users: 51
2 members and 49 guests
jeromefong, magaman
Most users ever online was 570, 05-23-2008 at 07:55 PM.
» Comment line

Powered by MyChingo
» Sponsor
» Advertisement

Remove Advertisement

View Single Post
Old 04-26-2006, 07:01 PM   #4 (permalink)
Reefbaby
Grand Master Reefer
 
Reefbaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Göteborg, Sweden
Posts: 2,092
Thanks: 12
Thanked 20 Times in 18 Posts
Reefbaby is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to Reefbaby
Quote:
it looks like i will be getting a 120 gal. w/ 40 gal sump and probably going to run the sump a little over half way so like 25 gals extra. so with that making my total volume 145 (150 maybe). and i know you want to turn that volume over 10-15 times. making that 1500-2250 gph.
I agree with what Dave is saying about "turnover" vs "flow". Personally, I would suggest going with a lower turnover through your sump (3-5X is sufficient). And I would get the rest of the flow within the display. Your idea of a closed loop manifold is a great way to distribute flow into more areas of the tank, without blasting away from one powerhead output. However, I wouldn't recommend a spray bar...haven't heard too many good things about those.

If you use a closed loop manifold, you can plumb tubing and outlets across the top of your tank as well as down along the back of your tank and towards the bottom. Also, you'll have the advantage of not having all the powerheads IN the display, which some consider an eye-sore.

Here's a link that I think Dave might have been referring to:
Goodbye Powerheads

Good luck!
__________________
Christi
Reefbaby is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ad Management by RedTyger